The memory of the Water Lilies
A shell went through one of the paintings. It was 1944. I'm in the Water Lilies room, the second and perhaps most secret room, at the back of the Musée de l'Orangerie. My father is with me. At the entrance, he is asked to leave his umbrella behind, perhaps for fear that in a rash move he might skewer a canvas. He, a little stung, turns to me. My father, so meticulous, who has been working on his paintings for years, my father whose skin smells of turpentine at all hours of the day, so much so that when I enter any museum in the world, I think I'm entering his home, my father lays down his arms. We both start laughing, firstly because if the museum were to be afraid of clumsiness, it would be mine, as I can only fully control my movements when I'm surrounded by music. But that's just as well, because they haven't yet noticed my awkward body, my ankle that trips easily, my arms that are always a little bigger than I'd imagine, as if I'd remained child-sized inside, and the amplitude of my adult movements still didn't come naturally to me. Except when the music's on. Then, by a magic trick that always surprises me, it makes the objects dance, softening the walls of reality and making room for my melancholy, stubborn bird's gestures, my child's gestures playing the adult. We also laugh simply because, I think, my father and I are both happy to be at the Orangerie on a day when it's closed. We walk through the entrance, with that determined step my father takes when he enters a museum. He heads straight for the Water Lilies. When I was little, I remember we only stopped in front of paintings that "called" to us. That's what he used to say: painting calls us. We'd walk briskly through a room, then stop dead in our tracks, because something had grabbed us. Then we'd stay for hours in front of a single painting. For a long time, I believed that the power of painting lay in its ability to grasp everything in a fraction of a second, the time it takes to look, as an experience of pure presence. But I've learned that it also tells us a story that is woven over time. You have to be on the lookout, keep your ears open, your heart open too, and accept moments of boredom. I'm sometimes struck by the similarities between music and painting. I believe that, like any language that attempts to express the invisible, painting is a matter of fidelity and patience. Sometimes we have to do violence to ourselves, to break down our inner resistance, to allow its secret language to emerge within us. We cross the first room, occupied by a team working on photographing the canvases in micro-fragments, for a 2.0 reproduction of which museums have the secret, before arriving at the second, empty room, bathed in a diffuse light designed to let the changing atmospheres of the day play with the painting, transforming it from hour to hour. I stop in front of a panel. The darkest, it seems to me. Perhaps the most enigmatic. Then I learn that this panel, the one that first called to me, the one that absorbs me because I feel I'm incapable of deciphering it, I learn that this panel was pierced by a shell in 1944. And it twists my stomach. Why am I always called by what was once destroyed?
I think, the war has erupted inside the canvas. I imagine the garden torn apart. Years of work to make the material vibrate, to turn the garden into sky, into movements torn from the soul, to make peace so strongly imprinted on the canvas that thousands of eyes crowd into this room to let it enter them. It has taken years to bring out these large panels, which contain so much beauty and so much anger, fragility, abandoned trials, flowers that are dead and born against the current, light that is charged with storm and also with azure, rage, complexity, and a mad faith in the living, in what is you, in what overflows us, in what will always be so much greater than us, in the infinite and changing movements of nature, in what is secretly made and unmade inside our bodies, and also in painting, in what tries to pierce the surface of reality, to dig into our gaze to the point of reopening the wound of having access only to a two-dimensional world, in what would turn the wound inside out like skinning an animal, to go to the side of the shadows, of the barely perceptible, of the enigma that permeates our every movement. The war tore this panel apart. The shell landed on the other side, but didn't explode. As if, for once, some angels had woken up and protected something of the world's fragility. Before going back to sleep and letting humans tear away what's left.
I'm standing next to my father, thinking about what would happen if a shell put a hole in one of his paintings. Nothing lasts, Clara. Sometimes we think we write, paint, compose, so that something remains, to leave a trace, like a mad movement against death and oblivion. But nothing lasts. He says that, my father, and he smiles. Calm. You really start painting when you realize that you're not doing it to fight oblivion, you're painting to try and balance something in the world. To oppose the forces of destruction that exist and will always exist with the forces of construction and invention. Not so that invention wins out, no, we've known since the dawn of time that it never does. But to ensure that these two dynamics continue to coexist. To try and tip the balance, for a few seconds, towards what makes us great. And if we've been able to feed the ocean beating against the frozen walls of fear, even just a drop, we've won. The gesture was worth it.
Then I look at my father, who's looking at the Water Lilies panel, the one that's been shelled and repaired. This idea of repair, of hours spent over the canvas to stitch it back together, to erase the war inside the pigments, brings tears to my eyes. I realize that I don't stop systematically in front of what has been destroyed, but rather in front of what we once tried to repair.
I look at my father and see him struggling with a painting. Endlessly. I think of his moments of anguish, when he can't find the canvas, when it refuses to appear, when it's close to being born but fails to stabilize its power. I think of his anxiety, as if it were always his first, as if it hadn't been forty years that one canvas followed another and that the paintings surprised him. He feels responsible for the light that once appeared. I understood this one day, watching him paint. I think my father feels responsible for the fragile light he once saw. That he can't bring himself to see it go out. As if he owed it a debt. A responsibility. And I look at his skin, his face hollowed out by years of tracking the vibration that emerges from the paint, all the hues, all the flashes that are born before him, his eyes crinkled by hours of waiting for a signal. We all too often forget that great works of art are a matter of craftsmanship, the sum of hours spent searching, trying, failing and trying again, until grace is achieved.
I can hear him singing nursery rhymes as he lays newspaper pages on top of the last fresh coats of paint, so that pigments from the upper layer are sucked out and the play of transparency makes the material vibrate.
I remember lying on the sofa in the studio, which is also his home, because over time painting and life have merged.
His vest is covered in color and oil stains. I can just imagine his hand movements as he puts on his gloves like a surgeon before heart surgery, his jeans impeccable and his leather shoes, which he bought twenty years ago and has taken care of like all the objects around him, yet they too are varnished with paint. I feel so close to him. Like a musician working with silence. Music sculpted for the retina.
I learn that Monet, at the end of his life, had cataracts. That he was almost blind. I look at the Water Lilies, and I think that the material for the Water Lilies may not be the garden, it may not be Giverny, but it is memory. A troubled memory, made up of emotions and fear, but also surely made up of the dreams and terrors of an era. The terrors of war, and therefore inexhaustible terrors. And Monet, plunged into the dark, into a reality that's becoming increasingly blurred, fuzzier and fuzzier, and perhaps more and more real, brings to light flowers, trees and skies that tell the story of the other side of the world, from the buried place of memory, from that which is lost and yet exists. I think of the etymology of the word désir, desiderare, to feel the lack of the star, and I imagine Monet in the dark, conjuring up from his memory this unreal garden in an attempt to catch the star in flight, to recall it, to imagine it, since it has made itself invisible. What we come to look for in Les Nymphéas is perhaps not so much the stabilized peace of a lost and found Garden of Eden, but rather to pierce the murky surface of the world, the murky surface of peace, to seize the infinite movement, the unspeakable hues, the torn memory, the castle of shadows, the reverse of sight. We come to experience the loss of sight, to see better. Something on the order of the ancient Greek pythias. Or the happiest possible experience of melancholy. To create out of lack a world that we bet is even more powerful than the one that has actually been lost and will never return. To tell melancholy that it is a weapon of unheard-of power. Thank you for lack. Thank you for movement, for transformation, for the stars we each silently inhabit, those that don't yet exist and that we could perhaps one day learn to collectively bring to life. Thank you for the Garden of Eden that blooms not in the past but in the future, and that's what we discover when we immerse ourselves in these panels carved into the flinty tongue of silence, protected somewhere under a glass roof, at the end of a terrace on the banks of the Seine, in the Tuileries Gardens.
Clara Ysé
Musée de L'Orangerie - Paris - 2023